Welcome! Do you like to experiment, theorize and seek the truth about free energy motors, generators, magnet machines and other magnetic devices? How about devices involving gravity, EM waves, longitudinal waves, radiant energy, the ether or other strange phenomena? Join me as I share some of my research, discoveries and inventions while exploring free energy and overunity ideas and principles from the past 20 plus years. The amateur scientist, experimenter, physicists and researcher are bound to find plenty of interesting thought-provoking fodder here.
There are many different definitions for free energy. The ultimate free energy sources would be those that match Nikola Tesla's view of Universal Free Energy. Universal Free Energy is not any specific energy source but can be of various kinds that meet the definition of a (free to us) energy source paid for by Nature, does not consume fuel, is available anywhere, and is available day and night. Universal Free Energy is the main goal of my research. Other energy sources are also explored here.
Some of the greatest scientists that have researched the free energy and over unity concept include Faraday, Roentgen, Tesla, Moray, J. J. Thompson, LeBon and Maxwell to name just a few. Is it a waste of time to look into free energy or over unity? A lot of very smart people in the past did not believe so.
Today's modern attitude of science is too smug and sure of its mathematical models and patch work of physics constructs. Consider lesss than 100 years ago few people had electricty or even bathroom toliets in their homes! If science is so absolute and all-knowing about the physics of the Universe, how is it that many of these smart people back then were living with a lack of toliets, poor personal hygiene, lead exposure etc. Now, barely a century later have we really advanced all that far that we know all the fundamentals in Nature? The science of today implies a very solid understanding in everything about matter and energy physics, yet some of the most mundane down-to-earth problems of the human condition have not been solved, like modern plastics, garabage, pesticide and air/water polution. It would seem these problems would be easier to solve than the equations of the Universe. We are all still childeren learning about Nature. The present physics at present is not almost complete as many may believe, but in fact is barely evolved to where it may lead in the future. As a people we have come far in a century as measured within that time period. Considering that humans 10,000 years ago are believd to be just as intelligent as people today, it is fantastic to consider where science technology would be now had the first chemical battery (Volta 1791) been discovered then. Man was simply not ready to advance. But all the elements for discovery were in place by 2000 years ago when in Baghdad the components of battery (cell) appear to have been in use according archeological findings. The Baghdad cell is a possible battery that could have spurred science and technology explosions, as the Volta pile did, but somehow was not further researched and mankind would wait nearly 1,800 years to rediscover the same invention. How did so many smart people miss it time after time in the past? This is why science needs to react without bias evertime something seems strange and wants to cry "impossible" or "you can't do that" type of mentality. In summary, we are already 1,800 years behind in science & technology. We need to stop slapping eachother on the back for what we know in science and when we as a race are actually very far behind from where we could have been now. Scientist in 1,800 years from now will see us just as quaint and primitive as we now look back at science 1,800 years ago.
There are many different definitions for free energy. The ultimate free energy sources would be those that match Nikola Tesla's view of Universal Free Energy. Universal Free Energy is not any specific energy source but can be of various kinds that meet the definition of a (free to us) energy source paid for by Nature, does not consume fuel, is available anywhere, and is available day and night. Universal Free Energy is the main goal of my research. Other energy sources are also explored here.
Some of the greatest scientists that have researched the free energy and over unity concept include Faraday, Roentgen, Tesla, Moray, J. J. Thompson, LeBon and Maxwell to name just a few. Is it a waste of time to look into free energy or over unity? A lot of very smart people in the past did not believe so.
Today's modern attitude of science is too smug and sure of its mathematical models and patch work of physics constructs. Consider lesss than 100 years ago few people had electricty or even bathroom toliets in their homes! If science is so absolute and all-knowing about the physics of the Universe, how is it that many of these smart people back then were living with a lack of toliets, poor personal hygiene, lead exposure etc. Now, barely a century later have we really advanced all that far that we know all the fundamentals in Nature? The science of today implies a very solid understanding in everything about matter and energy physics, yet some of the most mundane down-to-earth problems of the human condition have not been solved, like modern plastics, garabage, pesticide and air/water polution. It would seem these problems would be easier to solve than the equations of the Universe. We are all still childeren learning about Nature. The present physics at present is not almost complete as many may believe, but in fact is barely evolved to where it may lead in the future. As a people we have come far in a century as measured within that time period. Considering that humans 10,000 years ago are believd to be just as intelligent as people today, it is fantastic to consider where science technology would be now had the first chemical battery (Volta 1791) been discovered then. Man was simply not ready to advance. But all the elements for discovery were in place by 2000 years ago when in Baghdad the components of battery (cell) appear to have been in use according archeological findings. The Baghdad cell is a possible battery that could have spurred science and technology explosions, as the Volta pile did, but somehow was not further researched and mankind would wait nearly 1,800 years to rediscover the same invention. How did so many smart people miss it time after time in the past? This is why science needs to react without bias evertime something seems strange and wants to cry "impossible" or "you can't do that" type of mentality. In summary, we are already 1,800 years behind in science & technology. We need to stop slapping eachother on the back for what we know in science and when we as a race are actually very far behind from where we could have been now. Scientist in 1,800 years from now will see us just as quaint and primitive as we now look back at science 1,800 years ago.
Energy Generation and Conversion: It is All We Care About
Learned scholars teach us to not bother with "perpetual motion machines" becasuse they all would break energy conservation laws and that is true....unless some device is not really "a perpetual motion machine." How many learned scholars have admitted their mistaken position on some impossible idea? I can not think of any. Funny how it seems that nothing in physics is allowed until some scholar says so. Regular, educated and intelligent persons do not seem to get any credit these days. The point is not to bash scholars, we need great scholars, but until every single aspect of physics is explained completely, it is ludericious, to act like we know everything. Thus the playing field is widened to everyone to contribute to Science. Consider, in the past, some of the greatest inventions with the largest impact on the human condition were created by non-scholarly persons. Consider Leonardo da Vinci with (now proven) winged flight, Tesla (Did not complete his studies) with AC electricity in everyone of our homes, Robert Fulton with the steam engine which greatly powered the Industrial Revolution and led to the future invention of the internal combustion engine and finally Babbage with his mechanical calculators which were the first computers.
Discovery and invention is for everyone. The Laws of Nature are the only laws: We can not violate that which Nature does not already allow. The scholar is only making the "law" after the fact from observing Nature. If the scholar is wrong, he shackles society and scientific progress. So, on this website we do not care what is said to be impossible or is in violation of energy conservation laws. We only care about repeatable results and logical constructs that match observations and experiment. How we get there, who cares, as long as we do. It was Tesla who said, often when others insisted on following a certain direction of belief, he would take the exact opposite which would lead to totally new previously unknown phenomena. Mathematics is a tool and not an absolute proof. Experiment and observation is the real proof of reality and mathematics is a logic tool to aide our belief that our observations and predictions are correct. It is said in computer circles that "garbage in equals garbage out," I think that is true and can occur when relying too much mathematics to "prove" some belief or conclusion especially when the math becomes the "proof" and there was no experiment to back it up. These are just a few of the realizations the discoverer or inventor in science should be aware as they explore exciting new directions.
When it comes to free energy over unity ideas the following applies. Just because it has not (supposedly) been done, does not confirm or validate any reasoning that it is impossible to do. Once it is done, Science will clamor all over it to "explain why it works." Of course this is after the fact! Smug Science and saving face!
Note: This website is the update to my old site Quantum Transformer.
Discovery and invention is for everyone. The Laws of Nature are the only laws: We can not violate that which Nature does not already allow. The scholar is only making the "law" after the fact from observing Nature. If the scholar is wrong, he shackles society and scientific progress. So, on this website we do not care what is said to be impossible or is in violation of energy conservation laws. We only care about repeatable results and logical constructs that match observations and experiment. How we get there, who cares, as long as we do. It was Tesla who said, often when others insisted on following a certain direction of belief, he would take the exact opposite which would lead to totally new previously unknown phenomena. Mathematics is a tool and not an absolute proof. Experiment and observation is the real proof of reality and mathematics is a logic tool to aide our belief that our observations and predictions are correct. It is said in computer circles that "garbage in equals garbage out," I think that is true and can occur when relying too much mathematics to "prove" some belief or conclusion especially when the math becomes the "proof" and there was no experiment to back it up. These are just a few of the realizations the discoverer or inventor in science should be aware as they explore exciting new directions.
When it comes to free energy over unity ideas the following applies. Just because it has not (supposedly) been done, does not confirm or validate any reasoning that it is impossible to do. Once it is done, Science will clamor all over it to "explain why it works." Of course this is after the fact! Smug Science and saving face!
Note: This website is the update to my old site Quantum Transformer.